One man’s story.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “One man’s story.

  1. Dear Fellow Intactivist.

    I certainly support all intactivists, but insist in intactivism’s principal responsibility of giving correct information.

    Where I detect errors in statements, I do react in professional correction and certainly always in due respect of your efforts to bring this global collective child abuse of forced circumcision to its end. But it is paramount to give correct information!!!

    The terminology used on this site:
    “vote to make circumcision illegal” FAILS to differentiate between:

    A) Medically warranted and therefore LEGAL circumcision; and

    B) non-therapeutic circumcision on children which constitutes infliction of non-accidental injury on a child and is therefore considered PHYSICAL CHILD ABUSE and is therefore ALREADY OUTLAWED under Australian Liberal Democratic Rule of Law, which of course protects all children of any age and gender equally from infliction of non-accidental injury!!!

    It therefore is also WRONG to call for “legislation” of a “special law” to “outlaw” non-therapeutic circumcision on male children, simply because FGM and MGM are ALREADY OUTLAWED under current Australian Liberal Democratic Rule of Law under which ANY from of infliction of non-accidental injury on children of ANY age and gender constitutes PHYSICAL CHILD ABUSE.

    It is true that current Australian Rule of Law on infliction of non-accidental injury to children does not speak specifically about “male-child non-therapeutic circumcision “; but this is also not required of the law to specify every possible event of infliction of non-accidental injury on a child , and the law is also not required to “specify ” that the child protection law protects both male AND female children equally.

    This “master thesis” published on the site and aims for “application of Australian law to male circumcision and recommends law reform to improve its regulation”; and furthermore states: “There are no specific laws that regulate the practice in Australia”, is absolutely dilettantish and in this totally estranged from the undisputable reality of current valid Australian Liberal Democratic Rule of Law, under which ANY form of infliction of non-accidental injury to children of any age and gender is already outlawed, and this of course includes (without specification) also the removal of the healthy prepuce (healthy body part) of any child of any age and gender!!!

    Infliction of non-accidental injury to children, and therefore also non-therapeutic circumcision on children constitutes a Violation of the Australian Penal Code!!!

    The juristic terminology infliction of non-accidental injury to children, addresses all and any possible event of such infliction of non-accidental injury to any child and to any adult if inflicted on the adult without this adult’s consent.

    This and any other “theses” written in the aim for “legislation” of a “law to outlaw non-therapeutic circumcision on male children”, is as law-reality contradictive, nonsensical and counterproductive and misleading as any of the MGM-Bill-Initiatives of the past 18 years.

    This “thesis” and any of the MGM-Bill-Initiatives WRONGLY imply that “FGM is already outlawed, but MGM is not already outlawed, and that we therefore face a “legislation-problem ” … This of course is in direct contradiction of the reality of current rule of law, and is a clear sign of fundamental failure of judgement; and based upon mere hearsay, deceitful fallacy, make-believe and total misconception, and absolutely estranged from empiric evidence of the Principe of Liberal Democracy and its fundamental Concept of the Rule of Law!!

    This “master thesis” and all these MGM-Bill-Initiatives are as NONSENSICAL as it is nonsensical to “petition” for the “legislation” of a “law” which evidently already exists.

    This “master thesis” and all these MGM-Bill-Initiatives are as NONSENSICAL as it is nonsensical to “petition” for the “legislation” of a “law to outlaw the removal of a healthy fingernail from the body of a child “, while it is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR as OBIOUSE that the “removal of a healthy fingernail from the body of a child of any age and gender ” IS a form of infliction of non-accidental injury on a child; and is therefore considered PHYSICAL CHILD ABUSE and is therefore ALREADY OUTLAWED under current Liberal democratic Rule of Law, even in the case that the current law does not “specifically” mention the event of “removal of the healthy fingernail from the body of a child”.

    The profound professional professor of law; the normal IQ student of law; any undisturbed adult mind and heart is able to FULLY COMPREHEND and ACKNOWLEDGE this undisputable, all in all CORRECT legal deduction I offer not only to all Academies of Law from Princeton to Harvard but also to the entire Intactivist Movement (also in Australia) in my Universal Lectures and hundreds of documents and thousands of posts (also on facebook).

    Again:
    IT IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG to call for “special legislation” on MGM, simply because MGM and FGM are already OUTLAWED under current valid rule of law!

    IT IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG to say “FGM is already outlawed, but MGM is not already outlawed”.

    IT IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG to address the FGM-Law as if it were a “legitimate law”; simply because the FGM-Law is a discriminatory law ; a law which EXCLUDES the male child population from its fundamental state guaranteed right of equal protection; and is therefore a unconstitutional law , which means that the FGM-Law IS AN INVALID LAW / an ILLEGAL LAW / a NULL and VOID LAW; a law in contempt of the Principe of Democracy and its Concept of the Rule of Law!!!

    True Intactivism´s predominant responsibility is to give CORRECT INFORMATION, and therefore to absolutely distance itself from also the misleading, absolutely wrong sentence “Only FGM is already outlawed, but MGM is not already outlawed “.

    This of course means that the more than 130 Intactivist Groups and Organisations who continue to speak and act so as if “Only FGM were already outlawed, and so as if we would face a “legislation-problem” on MGM”, to CORRECT their statement; to change their wrong / incorrect juristic position, and to finally acknowledge the profound / undisputable medical, sociological and JURISTIC ACADEMIC POSITION of the Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity; and therefore ENDORSE our Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement just as is stated within.

    I state again: THE CURRENT wording of the RULE of LAW speaks in clear protection of both male and female citizen of any age and gender; and an “amendment” or “the legislation of a special MGM-Law” IS NOT REQUIRED!!!

    It is HIGH TIME that also the more than 130 Intactivist Groups and Organisations STOP its blatant refusal of acknowledging empiric evidence and to act so as if this evidence were not to exist, and speak and act as if they would not been INFORMED about these undisputable facts by my person.

    Yes it is possible to ignore my undisputable law-deductions, but this does not mean that the empiric evidence I present is any less valid … and will just not exist when being ignored.

    “The Truth is always the Truth, even if all of you refuse to accept it”.
    “The Lie is always a Lie, even if all of you prefer to believe it”. Amen.

    I call for Global COOPERATIVE ACTION by way of ENDORSEMENT of our Universal Declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement , just as is stated in http://www.intacthumanity.org

    Prof. Amen Paternoster
    School of Humanity
    Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity
    http://www.intacthumanity.org
    intact.humanity@gmail.com

    • Thanks for your thoughts Amen. You may well be technically correct about the legal situation in Australia, and there are certainly others agree that circumcision is already illegal in Australia especially under existing assault and battery laws (http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/boyle1/#n57). But even if you are technically correct the powers that be do not see it that way and consequently do not act. From my layman’s point of view, what is required is a challenge/test case which forces the High Court to make a ruling on the matter. That, in turn, would force a response from the Federal Government…and sadly, given the power of certain lobby groups, that may well result in a less than satisfactory outcome! So my personal opinion is that lobbying for specific legislation is a valid ambition.

      • Thank you too for all you do.

        Yes I am aware of this ambition to lobby for specific legislation, which is being propagated by physicians, “law-experts” and other members of the intactivist movement since the 70s.

        These ambitions are mainly expressed in all these FAILED 19 US-MGM-Bill Initiatives in the past 18 years, and these MGM-Bills as any other dynamic aimed for specific legislation on MGM did not only FAIL “so by the way”; but are in its nonsensical / all in all law-reality contradictive nature PRE-SET TO FAIL.

        When I heard of the initiative for legislation of a FGM-Law 1994 to 1996, I was the only Professor of Law on the globe who stated beforehand that the legislation of a “specific law on FGM” is nonsensical and all in all in contempt of the existing law which already outlaws both MGM and FGM equally. The legislation process and of course the enactment of the FGM-Law is in contempt of the Principe of Liberal Democracy and its fundamental Concept of the Rule of Law.

        When I heard of the initiative for legislation of a MGM-Law, I again was the only person who stated beforehand that the legislation of a “specific law on FGM” is nonsensical and all in all in contempt of the existing law and in this it is a SET UP TO FAILURE!

        It sets the precedence for FAILURE because the first “petition” WILL FAIL and so will every other “petition”!

        My law deductions were ridiculed at the time. But I was right then, and I was right in my prediction [WARNING] of FAILURE on every single following MGM-Bill-Initiative.
        Every time – and since the 70s – I suggested Global Cooperative Legal Action on the base of existing law by way of ENDORSEMENT of the Universal Declaration of Demand to the Authority to fulfil its Obligation to Enforcement the Law on MGM based on the existing Law which evidently already outlaws both MGM and FGM equally.

        Conclusion:
        A) We have the existing valid law in place!
        B) We are facing two FUNDAMENTAL FAILURES of the Authority.
        C) These fundamental failures constitute Violation of the Principe of Liberal Democracy and its Concept of the Rule of Law.
        D) The authority’s fundamental failure of not enforcing the law on MGM; and the failure to enact the unconstitutional FGM-Law HAVE NO LEGAL AUTHORITY to overrule / invalidate the existing law under which MGM and FGM is already outlawed!
        E) The authority / no judge / no state attorney / no person is able to produce valid legal evidence to show a) that MGM is not an infliction of non-accidental injury to a child, just as is stated in http://www.intacthumanity.org

        It takes of course a CLEAR MIND to comprehend the significance of this Global Initiative.
        … and of course it requires the thousands of intactivists who until now “blindly opted for the obviously nonsensical “legislation-initiative” to be ready to admit this obvious failure in judgement.
        “petitioning” for “legislation” of a law which already exists is certainly NOT a valid and in this also not a professional dynamic.
        Endorsement of the Universal declaration of Demand for Law Enforcement is. Amen

        Prof. Amen Paternoster
        Global Symposium for an Intact Humanity
        http://www.intacthumanity.org
        intact.humanity@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s